>
>Stanley Mazor
>
>Clocks, Culture, Contrast
>
>
>
>Stan will contrast the development of the clock in the eastern and
western cultures
>and describe a confluence of conditions that "propel technology" in
the west:
>
>-European bell towers get synchronized with clocks
>
>-The development of gears for clocks contributes to developing
water mills,
> windmills, and steam engines
>
>-Bubonic plague creates a labor shortage in Europe motivating the
machine
> age in the west
>
>-Asia has no plague, no labor shortage, and western clocks "don't
work"
>
>Stan Mazor worked on the design of Symbol, a high level language
computer
>at Fairchild in 1967, and then helped develop the early Intel
microcomputers.
>He has published extensively on the subject of chip design and
Moore's law,
>and recently published a book on architecture, Design an Expandable
House.
>Stan is in the Inventor's Hall of Fame, and has received the Kyoto
Prize, the PC
>Magazine Lifetime Achievement Award, the Robert Noyce Award from
SIA, and
>the Ron Brown American Innovator Award.
>
Stan began his talk by explaining that it was based partly on Clocks
and Culture by Carlo Cipolla and Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared
Diamond, and partly on his own experiences. Key among those was his
sabbatical in China (PRC) back in 1983, where he had a major culture
shock when he realized there were people doing all kinds of things that
would be automated in Silicon Valley. Things like metering traffic are
done there by people and here by machines. Stan saw that they had no
interest in automating those jobs, and it was contrary to his
California life experiences.
Keeping time has long been a characteristic of western European
systems. Stan listed a number of early clock designs including the
sundial, water clock, hour glass, and marked candle. He explained that
clocks with mechanical mechanisms to meter passing time first came into
existence in the 1300 to 1600 time frames. At first they were mainly
confined to bell tower ring synchronizing, but as the mechanisms
improved with springs they got more widely used.
Before the modern era, clocks never developed in China and Japan. The
Chinese peasants measured time in days and months, with the big moments
being "planting time" and the like. The Chinese word for clock roughly
translates as "self ringing bell". They were seen as novelties, and not
many were imported because of that. In Japan, an hour was defined as "a
sixth of the time between sun up and sun set", so western clocks never
managed to tell the right time since the seasonal differences in the
daylight, and the varying length hour were contrary to the western
fixed hour clock design. Another factor was that the great plague wiped
out about one-third of the population in Europe and caused an increase
in wages, and a labor shortage. This motivated and "necessitated"
augmented machine labor, which wasn't the case at all in the orient.
Stan thinks clock making technology improvements driven by the need for
better clocks have had a bigger cumulative impact on the state of our
technology than even the steam engine. He pointed out that a reliable
and accurate watch has many small components that have to work very
well together. He called it "The key machine of the industrial
revolution" because of the way physics, mathematics, and practice are
married in its mechanism.
Tian Harter