I think the pictures on this page capture a slide show that was designed to go with somebody standing there saying "these are brief statements of the problems we found in the 9/11 commission report."



The points below illustrate some of the reasons that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth find it hard to believe there were no explosives used to bring down the twin towers.





For me, the burning indictment wasn't the physical evidence, although that was bothersome. It just insulted my belief in due process that they used the 9/11 attacks to justify a war, but they didn't even empannel an investigation of the event for more than a year after that. Can you say "ready, shoot, aim"? I've yet to see anything that tied Sadam Hussein (or Iraq) to the attacks on the twin towers.

1111