The points below illustrate some of the
reasons that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth find it hard to
believe there were no explosives used to bring down the twin towers.
For me, the burning
indictment wasn't the physical evidence, although that was bothersome.
It just insulted my belief in due process that they used the 9/11
attacks to justify a war, but they didn't even empannel an
investigation of the event for more than a year after that. Can you say
"ready,
shoot, aim"? I've yet to see anything that tied Sadam Hussein (or Iraq)
to the attacks on the twin towers.
1111