Last fall at the Green Festival I came across a table for the
International Forum on Globalization, where they were selling these
books titled Alternatives to Economic Globalization. I got one because
it looked interesting, and put it on my "to read soon" pile. It sat
there until I heard Scoop Nisker interview Jerry Mander (one of the
authors, along with John Cavanagh and many others) on the radio one
Sunday morning. That made me pick it up and read it.
The authors have studied the current global situation and how we got
into it in enormous detail. Their perspective is that of the crowds
outside the WTO ministerial meetings in Seattle and Cancun. Instead of
slogans, there is page after page of thoughtful analysis. This is
followed by page after page of suggestions for ways to steer our system
towards a better future. This pattern is repeated in chapter after
chapter, as the major "operating systems" (Energy, Transportation,
Manufacturing, Agriculture, Media, and others) of our world are
examined. The ideas are explained clearly enough that you can see how
the concepts of globalization can be replaced with something better.
For example, the authors feel that one of the big forces of economic
globalization is subsidies for large private enterprises by big
government. There is an entire chapter titled "Subsidiarity: Recalling
Power from the Global". In it they suggest a number of simple rules for
making local communities, businesses, and governance a bigger part of
the system we live in. These are things like "put new controls on
corporate activity", "ground capital and investment in the community",
"increase direct public participation in policymaking", and "Encourage
social cohesion and local economic renewal." Then there are suggestions
on investment like "all investors should respect basic human rights and
protect the environment as top priorities." Many of the ideas seem like
the kind of thing readers could use as guidelines for their own
activism, although others would clearly require change in governance
structures.
In the section on media, the authors begin by explaining that the goal
of economic globalization is to create a situation where "every place
on earth is more or less like every other place on earth:
'globalized'." By this they mean that huge media conglomerates (Time
Warner, Disney, Fox, etc.) get huge economies of scale by selling the
same information with the same advertising to people who want the same
thing all over the planet. As an alternative, they point to things like
a campaign in New Zealand in 1991 that made local content in
broadcasting a "human rights issue", or IndyMedia, that burst on the
scene in Seattle during the WTO meeting there, putting out a version of
what was happening radically different from the one in the Corporate
Media. Among other things, they suggest "supporting and empowering
Alternative Media."
At the end of the book there are a couple of chapters of suggestions of
things a reader can do to change things. They range from things like
"buy local" and "support fair trade" to "work against urban sprawl by
voicing your concerns at county and state meetings" and "learn how the
World Bank, IMF, and WTO how their policies affect your country". This
is followed by 22 pages of contact information for groups working to
change things and a fifteen page bibliography. Browsing the list, I
found many organizations I have never heard of before like "World Forum
of Fisher Peoples" mixed in with familiar ones like Global Exchange and
GreenPeace.
Tian Harter
My father looked it over and said "There are a number of places where
the authors are dead wrong about the WTO."